Scott County & the Case for Needle Exchange

By Marcus J. Hopkins, Blogger

The past week in the state of Indiana has been, if nothing else, hectic. The signing of the legislature’s “Religious Freedom Restoration Act” bill has largely overshadowed a considerably more pressing issue – a sudden outbreak of HIV infections in a single county related to injection drug use.

In Scott County, Indiana, a mere five unique cases of HIV infection are reported (on average), every year; that number has seen a dramatic increase to 81 unique infections. This type of mass infection is no longer commonplace, as injection drug (ID) use accounts for a very small number of new HIV infections, nationally, but it does spell trouble, not only for residents in and around Scott County, Indiana, but in every area in the country with a high incidence of ID use and abuse.

Map showing Scott County, Indiana

Photo Credit: Family Search

Injection drug use is unique amongst drug statistics in that it disproportionately impacts economically depressed regions. From heroin to prescription opioid abuse, wherever there is a high concentration of lower-income residents combined with less economic opportunity and social mobility, one is likely to find a high incidence of ID use.

As this is a blog related to Hepatitis C, it becomes more relevant to our pet cause – much of the burgeoning Hepatitis C infection rate in younger Americans (between the ages of 13-35) is directly related to ID use. What is more concerning, to me, is how those demographics play such a large part in this crisis and how legislators are responding to this clear and present crisis.

In response to this outbreak, the Indiana legislature has taken time out of its busy Jim Crow Revitalization schedule to actually craft a piece of functional legislation that would allow for the short-term establishment of needle exchange programs in high-risk counties.

If this sounds like a case of “Too Little, Too Late,” it is; but that seems to be the way with health care initiatives, in America. As a nation, we have a high predilection towards “Reactive Measures,” rather than “Proactive Measures.” The topic of needle exchange programs has long been both a highly effective measure, proven to result in fewer ID-related infections, as well as a highly contentious issue for politicians who are hell bent on marginalizing and criminalizing ID users.

Needle exchanges have consistently demonstrated their importance and effectiveness in areas where ID use is high; the ability for users to exchange used and potentially “dirty” needles for clean ones helps to stem the spread of highly virulent infections, such as Hepatitis and HIV. This has been shown to be the case all around the U.S. for over twenty-five years, and yet, they remain largely absent in the healthcare landscape.

The controversy stems from a [mostly Conservative espoused] belief that implementing needle exchange programs is tantamount to encouraging ID use, and that if these programs exist, they will lead to the quick and furious destruction of the American way of life, as heroin zombies are well-known to spread their disease to everyone with whom they come in contact, and soon, armies of the walking drug addled will overwhelm security forces and leave the nation a wasteland of burning cities and devastated landscapes.

Wait…those are just regular zombies.

Sign reading,

Indiana Needle Exchange

These arguments against the establishment of needle exchange programs have, time and again, proven to be both spurious and demonstrably false. Areas who’ve created and maintained exchanges have consistently shown a decrease in new ID-related infections, and are consistently paired with more effective and far reaching outreach, support, and recovery programs for ID users who are looking to break the cycle of drug abuse.

Unfortunately, science, facts, and evidence supported by research rarely play a part in the creation of healthcare legislation, as elected officials seem more often to rely on a game of numbers (profits over people…in the short-term, anyway), combined with a healthy dose of hysteria, faux moral outrage, and political posturing.

What’s troubling about the legislation crafted in Indiana to respond to this acute HIV outbreak is that it’s not only too little, too late, it’s likely to prove ineffective in the short-term time frame they’ve established for these high-risk counties.

Politicians who are skeptical of any public health initiative that might actually work consistently fail to understand that, in order for any public health initiative to be effective, they have to not only be established, they must also be well-funded and permanent. Long-term health outcomes require long-term solutions, and this seems to be something that anti-government elected officials can’t quite understand – they only work if the efforts are maintained and continuous.

Reactive approaches to healthcare rarely prove effective – how does one stop an outbreak from becoming an outbreak, if there’s already an outbreak? – and, though I applaud the temporary bout of sanity with which the Indiana legislative bodies have been suddenly stricken, I am dubious of the long-term continuance of said sanity (remember – long-term problems require long-term approaches).

And so, despite this sudden outbreak of HIV infections, I am not optimistic that this incident, or any other incident that negatively impacts people who have very few resources to contribute to political campaigns, will lead to any sort of long-term solution until we can manage to get sensible, fact- and research-based legislative efforts to move forward in elected governmental bodies. And, as this will require the election into office of legislators who are willing to buck the faux moral outrage of their very vocal, yet uniquely ill-informed, constituents in favor of sensible policy creation, that’s just not very likely to occur.


Disclaimer: HEAL Blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the Community Access National Network (CANN), but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about Hepatitis-related issues and updates. Please note that the content of some of the HEAL Blogs might be graphic due to the nature of the issues being addressed in it.


1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

One response to “Scott County & the Case for Needle Exchange

  1. Pingback: Scott County and Indiana’s Steep Learning Curve on HIV and Hepatitis C | communityaccessnationalnetwork

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s