Tag Archives: Viral Hepatitis

Hepatitis A: Extreme Sanitation Measures in San Diego

HEAL Blog is the recipient of the ADAP Advocacy Association’s 2015-2016 ADAP Social Media Campaign of the Year Award
By: Marcus J. Hopkins, Blogger

As a blog designed to talk about issues related to Viral Hepatitis and HIV, we do our best to stay focused on the topic of Hepatitis C (HCV). Recent developments in San Diego, CA, however, have captured our attention and merit coverage and discussion.

Since early 2017, the Public Health Services Division (PHSD) in the San Diego Health and Human Services Agency (HHSA) has been investigating a significant outbreak of the Hepatitis A (HAV) virus. As of September 12, 2017, there have been 421 confirmed cases of Acute HAV which have resulted in 292 hospitalizations (69%) and 16 deaths (3.8%). The majority of these cases have been within San Diego’s homeless and/or illicit drug user populations, although some cases have been neither (HHSA, 2017).

Hepatitis A Outbreak Spreads Beyond Homeless in San Diego

Photo Source: San Diego Informer

HAV is spread primarily by ingesting the virus by way of contact with objects, food, or drinks contaminated by feces or stool from an infected person, and the symptoms may include fever, fatigue, loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, dark urine, clay-colored bowel movements, joint pain, and/or jaundice (yellowing of the skin or eyes). Moreover, HAV is very hardy and is able to live outside the human body for months, making it particularly easy to spread (CDC, 2016).

In response to this outbreak, San Diego has taken the unusually proactive step of implementing extreme health measures in order to combat the spread of HAV including the installation of 40 handwashing stations in areas with high concentrations of homeless people, sanitization efforts in those areas, holding 256 mass vaccination events and 109 “foot teams” of public health nurses who go into the aforementioned areas to offer vaccinations, distributing over 2,400 hygiene kits that include water, non-alcohol hand sanitizer, cleaning wipes, clinic location information, and plastic bags, and implementing street cleaning protocols that require sanitation department workers to power-wash streets and buildings with chlorine and bleach (Bever, 2017).

While these measures may seem extreme, the reality of combating an HAV outbreak once it’s already taken hold means that extraordinary steps must be taken. Despite the availability of HAV vaccinations since 1995, much of the homeless and indigent population either lack access to those healthcare resources, or are too old to have been vaccinated as children. During the mass vaccination events, county health officials have vaccinated 19,000 people, including 7,300 considered to be at-risk of contracting the disease (Warth, 2017). Additionally, the city has agreed to extend public toilet hours to 24/7 in order to allow homeless people access to the restrooms, rather than defecate in the open, whether others may come in contact (Montes, 2017).

While these proactive measures will certainly help to combat the spread, the most important step will be reaching, vaccinating, and educating hard-to-reach/hard-to-treat homeless, indigent, and/or illicit drug user populations in an effort to effect behavioral changes in order to prevent further spread of the disease. This means teaching proper handwashing techniques, proper hygiene, and proper sterilization of equipment used to partake in illicit drug use. San Diego, despite the dire circumstances it currently endures, is taking the right steps to ensure safer streets for their homeless population.

References:

__________

Disclaimer: HEAL Blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the Community Access National Network (CANN), but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about Hepatitis-related issues and updates. Please note that the content of some of the HEAL Blogs might be graphic due to the nature of the issues being addressed in it.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Compulsory Viral Hepatitis Screening is a Pathway to Elimination

HEAL Blog is the recipient of the ADAP Advocacy Association’s 2015-2016 ADAP Social Media Campaign of the Year Award
By: Marcus J. Hopkins, Blogger

At the International AIDS Society’s (IAS’) 4th Annual HIV/Viral Hepatitis Co-Infection Meeting in Paris, France, aside from all of the various data regarding rates of infection around the globe and various approaches to eradicating Hepatitis B and C (HBV/HCV, respectively) by the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) target year of 2030, one assertion rang true throughout: all of these projections and approaches will require robust Harm Reduction measures to be put in place.

For the uninitiated, Harm Reduction measures are various laws, regulations, and statutes put into place in order to reduce injury or death from a specific cause; a good example of this would be a Seat Belt Law. As they relate to Viral Hepatitis (VH), Harm Reduction statutes include various methods of reducing the likelihood of infection (and thereby death), such as the mandatory use of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs), ID requirements for the purchase of prescription opioid drugs, and prescriber education about the risks of prescribing opioids and proper opioid usage. One set of measures, however, would serve several purposes: mandatory or compulsory screening requirements for HIV, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C.

"Hepatitis" on a screen, with a stethoscope

Photo Source: CTV News

A handful of states (CT, FL, MA, NY, and PA) have considered or passed mandatory screening guidelines for the Birth Cohort (people born between 1945-1965). These guidelines are largely inefficient, because they rely upon an “Opt-In” method of screening, meaning that patients are offered screening, and must accept – it’s optional. Additionally, these measures focus only on the Birth Cohort, and understandably so, as they represent the largest percentage of existing HCV cases. These approaches, while well-intentioned, must be amended and updated on a national level, in order to effectively combat the spread of both HBV and HCV.

An estimated 70% of new Acute HCV infections are related to Injection Drug Use (IDU) by People Who Inject Drugs (PWIDs). That none of these screening guidelines make mention of these facts is indicative of our inability to accurately capture the data we need in order to adequately assess the scope and scale of the epidemic. Statistics at the state and national levels are largely reached using modeling that projects an estimated number that ostensibly accounts for underreporting. PWIDs are, however, notoriously difficult patients from whom to capture data, in no small part because we see them consistently in only a handful of healthcare settings: Hospitals for overdoses, Prisons, Jails, and Juvenile Detention Centers for incarceration, and Rehabilitation facilities. In addition, Syringe Services Programs (SSPs) are another excellent point of data collection, but it must be handled differently than those previously listed.

The most effective method of screening is to make it compulsory (mandatory) on an “Opt-Out” basis in which patients are informed that screening for HIV, HBV, and HCV are part of a required set of screenings, and they must provide “informed refusal” of the test. This requires that all hospitals, clinics, justice/incarceration settings, and rehabilitation facilities adopt this method of screening in order for the most effective use of time and money that will result in the most accurate data captures. When opioid and heroin users overdose and are the recipient of emergent care services, this is the prime location to capture data from PWIDs. The same holds true for those who are moved into justice settings, as well as those who enter rehabilitation services. Additionally, with the use of rapid HCV antibody testing, this can be accomplished in a relatively short period of time. The important part is ensuring that each Positive test result is followed up with an immediate secondary confirmatory screening, rather than scheduling a second appointment.

These types of compulsory screening requirements are paramount to achieving the WHO’s goal of eradication of HBV and HCV by 2030. Once patients know their status, with proper linkage to care services, they can be cured of HCV and treated for HBV with relative ease. This will, of course, require an investment on the part of state, Federal, public, and private partners, and until we have Federal movement on these issues, the best location to start is at the state-level. Personally, I am working on an endeavor with one of West Virginia’s delegates to work on building a workable and FUNDED compulsory screening requirement as close to the one I suggested above, given the complex nature of WV’s budgetary constraints. We at HEAL Blog invite you to do the same, in order to ensure that compulsory screening becomes a reality.

__________

Disclaimer: HEAL Blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the Community Access National Network (CANN), but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about Hepatitis-related issues and updates. Please note that the content of some of the HEAL Blogs might be graphic due to the nature of the issues being addressed in it.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Viral Hepatitis Funding Lowest in States Most at Risk

HEAL Blog is the recipient of the ADAP Advocacy Association’s 2015-2016 ADAP Social Media Campaign of the Year Award
By: Marcus J. Hopkins, Blogger

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently released the data related to Viral Hepatitis (VH) surveillance in the U.S. for 2015, and the picture is…grim. While many states saw relatively stable rates of new Acute Hepatitis C (HCV) infections, two states – AL and PA – experienced 100% increases from 2014 (CDC, 2017). CDC funding for states’ respective Viral Hepatitis programs, however, tends to fall short in states where rates of infection are high relative to the population (The AIDS Institute, 2017).

Infection rates are generally calculated by taking the number of total infections, dividing that by a state’s total population, and multiplying that result by 100,000 to calculate how many people, on average, will be infected for every 100,000 residents. For example:

The state of West Virginia reported 63 new cases in 2015; the state has a population of 1,844,000, so 63/1,844,000 = 0.00003416 x 100,000 = 3.416 rate of infection.

West Virginia, despite being the 14th least populous state (including the District of Columbia), has the second highest rate of new HCV infections in the U.S., second only to Massachusetts, which has a rate of 3.7. The following chart lists the top ten states in order of highest infection rate, their respective populations, and the amount of funding in those states for VH:

Chart showing 10 states with highest viral hepatitis infections also having lowest state budgets to combat the disease, including MA, WV, KY, TN, ME, IN, NM, MT, NJ, NC

The above chart seems to be indicative of two things irrespective of a state’s population: (1.) certain states make VH funding a priority, while others do not; (2.) states are simply not receiving enough funding from the Federal government and the CDC to bring their VH programs up to funding levels adequate enough to effectively combat VH.

Each of these states has a number of factors contributing to their respective rates of infection: (1.) Aging populations (Baby Boomers born between 1945-1965); (2.) High rate of Injection Drug Use related to opioid drugs, heroin, or stimulants; (3.) Sharp increase in the number of tests administered, resulting in higher rates of positive results.

What is clear is that funding for VH is woefully inadequate if the U.S. intends to eradicate HCV from the U.S. by 2030.

References:

__________

Disclaimer: HEAL Blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the Community Access National Network (CANN), but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about Hepatitis-related issues and updates. Please note that the content of some of the HEAL Blogs might be graphic due to the nature of the issues being addressed in it.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Emory University and CDC Reveal HepVu

HEAL Blog is the recipient of the ADAP Advocacy Association’s 2015-2016 ADAP Social Media Campaign of the Year Award
By: Marcus J. Hopkins, Blogger

The latest tool in Viral Hepatitis advocacy has arrived: HepVu (www.hepvu.org). A project of Emory University’s Coalition for Applied Modeling for Prevention (CAMP) – supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) – HepVu is an interactive website that provides various data related to Viral Hepatitis (VH), with the greatest emphasis being placed upon Hepatitis C (HCV), the least accurately reported variant in the U.S.

The website features interactive maps detailing estimated prevalence data, rates of infection, mortality data, and regional impacts and comparisons on both the national and state levels. While HCV data released by the annual National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted by the CDC produces national estimates, HepVu is the first analysis that uses a more nuanced formula that includes NHANES data, but also examines state-level reporting and statistics that includes electronic medical records (EMRs), insurance claims, and HCV-related mortality.

Other site features include infographics, explanations about the various types of VH, and the ability to print and download maps and data for use in advocacy efforts and reports. Dr. Patrick Sullivan, one of the researchers associated with creating the project, stated that making the site a resource for HCV-related advocacy and reporting efforts was an essential step in creating HepVu. This is the first HCV-related website (of which I am aware) that makes these data easily available for reprinting and citation purposes.

The contributing researchers to the website admit that this reporting is likely well below the actual prevalence and rates of infection, because screening, reporting, and tracking vary in quality and amount of data from state to state, in no small part because of a lack of Federal and state funding for HCV reporting, as well as adequate and standardized reporting requirements set by the CDC. Part of what makes this data so important is that it serves as a great starting point for advocating for increased funding for reporting and tracking – something that Congress has been slow to address, despite large increases in funding to address America’s opioid and heroin abuse crisis, the leading contributor to the rise in new HCV infections.

The primary limitation of the data presented on HepVu (and in general) is age: the vast majority of the data centers on 2010 and 2014 – seven and three years old, respectively. This complaint has been a sticking point for advocates and HCV-related organizations for several years, particularly because of the release of easily tolerated and highly effective Direct Acting Agents (DAAs) that serve as a curative treatment for HCV. Now that we have these tools to eradicate HCV, it is imperative that we begin operating on current information, rather than relying upon data that predates two presidential elections. This means that both Federal and state governments are going to have to step up to the plate and begin adequately funding screening, reporting, and tracking efforts, regardless of the high cost of these drugs.

HepVu is an excellent starting point, despite the data limitations, and so long as the statistics and information are regularly updated with more current information, it has the potential to become an invaluable tool in combating HCV and hopefully eradicating the virus from the U.S., entirely.

__________

Disclaimer: HEAL Blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the Community Access National Network (CANN), but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about Hepatitis-related issues and updates. Please note that the content of some of the HEAL Blogs might be graphic due to the nature of the issues being addressed in it.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Heroin and Hepatitis Go Hand in Hand

HEAL Blog is the recipient of the ADAP Advocacy Association’s 2015-2016 ADAP Social Media Campaign of the Year Award
By: Marcus J. Hopkins, Blogger

Over the past year, HEAL Blog has paid a lot of attention to heroin, particularly in relation to the massive increase in heroin and prescription opioid overdoses in Appalachia, the Midwest, and the Northeast. While the purpose of HEAL – “HEAL” standing for “Hepatitis: Education, Advocacy, and Leadership” – is to specifically address issues related to Viral Hepatitis, and particularly Hepatitis C (HCV), when we cover issues related to prescription opioid abuse and heroin, we sometimes fail to connect the dots between the two topics. There is, in fact, a very high correlation between Injection Drug Use (IDU), People Who Inject Drugs (PWIDs), and the transmission of HCV: most new HCV infections in the three previously listed regions are related to IDU.

Sources of Infection for Persons with Hepatitis C

Photo Source: Pinterest

HCV and HCV-related co-morbidities (e.g. – Cirrhosis, Advanced Liver Disease) kill more Americans each year than any other infectious disease (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016). It is also one of the most expensive diseases to treat, with Direct Acting Agent (DAA) drug Wholesale Acquisition Costs (WACs) ranging between $50,000 and $100,000 for twelve weeks of treatment. This makes preventing the spread of HCV not only a matter of physical health, but one of fiscal health.

Despite pharmaceutical manufacturers’ arguments that the one-time cost of a regimen to achieve a Sustained Virologic Response (SVR – “cure”) is far cheaper than the long-term costs of other diseases, not to mention the long-term costs that arise if HCV goes untreated, state and Federal healthcare budget departments remain unconvinced. Budgeting processes generally focus on a single year, rather than accounting for multi-year spending, so arguing that long-term expenditures “cost” more hasn’t been an effective argument. Even with the clandestine pricing agreements and rebates – clandestine, because they are not made public due to “trade secrets” laws – states have yet to begin treating every HCV-infected client on their government-funded rosters. To do so would blow through entire pharmacy budgets several times over, in many states.

With PWIDs representing the highest number of new HCV infections between the ages of 18-35, state legislatures are starting to come around to the realization that the best way to avoid spending that money on expensive treatments is to put into place Harm Reduction measures that are shown to prevent the spread of blood borne illnesses. As it is very difficult and unfeasible to stop IDU, syringe exchanges can be put into place that allow PWIDs to inject using clean needles, rather than sharing them.

Syringe exchanges have, for much of the past forty years, been largely reviled by politically conservative politicians and states; many Republican politicians have repeatedly argued that state-sponsored syringe exchanges will only encourage bad behavior, serving as a tacit endorsement of IDU. Now that prescription opioid and heroin abuse has moved outside of the urban areas and into the suburban and rural areas that serve as bastions of the Conservative ideal, suddenly, these politicians are coming around to the idea.

Medical technician counting needles.

Photo Source: Daily Beast

In the past two years, several considerably conservative states have passed laws allowing syringe exchanges to be established – Indiana, North Carolina, Ohio, and Virginia, to name a few – largely in response to a relative explosion of new HIV and HCV infections related to IDU. The problems that politicians and their constituents once relegated to the big cities have come to their quiet towns, and have done so right under their noses. The lessons out of Scott County, Indiana, where nearly 200 people tested positive for HIV near the end of 2015 and into 2016, are still reverberating throughout the region, and people are starting to look at ways to prevent the spread of disease, rather than punish the behavior.

It is clear that the opioid and heroin abuse epidemic is not going away, anytime soon. Since we aren’t likely to stop currently addicted people from injecting drugs, the smartest path forward is to at least make certain they can do so safely.

References:

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2016, May 04). Hepatitis C Kills More Americans than Any Other Infectious Disease. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Newsroom Home: Press Materials: CDC Newsroom Releases. Retrieved from: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2016/p0504-hepc-mortality.html

__________

Disclaimer: HEAL Blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the Community Access National Network (CANN), but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about Hepatitis-related issues and updates. Please note that the content of some of the HEAL Blogs might be graphic due to the nature of the issues being addressed in it.

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

2016 Year in Review

HEAL Blog is the recipient of the ADAP Advocacy Association’s 2015-2016 ADAP Social Media Campaign of the Year Award
By: Marcus J. Hopkins, Blogger

In the last post of 2016, we at HEAL Blog will take a look at the stories that presented the greatest issues of the year. While there are still new stories to cover, December presents an interesting challenge, as much of the news and events get swallowed up in the year-end hustle and bustle, as well as the excitement of the various holidays. As such, it serves as an excellent opportunity for reflection upon the year we leave behind, as well as aspirations we may have for the year to come.

In 2016, three main issues have garnered repeated coverage: nominal coverage versus actual access, the financial burden posed by newer Direct Acting Agents (DDAs) to treat Hepatitis C (HCV), and opioid and heroin abuse and overdose. The latter topic was featured or mentioned in no fewer than nineteen post, over the course of 2016, and if mortality and emergent care reports are indicative of any trend, that number is likely to increase in the coming year.

Perhaps the biggest frustration faced by patients is the lack of access to effective, easily tolerated HCV treatments. While most Medicaid, Medicare, AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs), and private insurance plans indicate on their formularies and Preferred Drug Lists (PDLs) that they offer coverage for newer DAA HCV drugs, actually gaining access to these drugs is often an exercise in patience, abstinence, and enraging hurdle jumping that leaves many patients in the lurch. Whether it’s waiting for one’s liver to degrade to the right fibrosis score, abstaining from drug and/or alcohol use for a predetermined period, or simply fighting through the various appeals and denials, most patients, regardless of their payer, face an uphill battle to being approved for treatment. Many of these trends were also covered throughout the year in the HIV/HCV Co-Infection Watch.

This type of nominal coverage – indicating that coverage is offered, but approving relative few prescriptions – is largely related to the second major issue of 2016: financial burden. Treating and curing HCV is expensive, though few payers have the flexibility to openly disclose exactly how expensive due to existing trade secrets laws that prevent them from publicly revealing the exact price they pay per drug. Regardless of the various discounts and rebates offered by drug manufacturers, every player has indicated that the price is still too high to remove the draconian Prior Authorization (PA) standards they’ve put in place to open coverage to everyone, regardless of liver degradation or whichever other bullet point they’ve managed to fail. Regardless of how many reports, studies, and analyses are put forth indicating that the short-term high cost of a cure is far less expensive than the longer-term repercussions and various related ailments and costs associated with untreated Chronic HCV, there is little indication from payers that these roadblocks to care will be removed.

Perhaps the most personally onerous barrier amongst these myriad prerequisites is the abstinence measure. With an estimated 60% of new HCV infection being related to Injection Drug Use (IDU), People Who Inject Drugs (PWIDs) are often the most stigmatized and marginalized patients infected with HCV. In fact, the stigma related to IDU HCV infection has been listed as one of the primary social barriers to screening for HCV; the threat of being perceived as a drug abuser by friends, relatives, healthcare professionals, and society at large leaves many people hesitant to be screened for HCV, and that fear is exacerbated by the growing number of opioid-related arrests, overdoses, and deaths reported in the media.

Opioid and heroin abuse and overdoses were, again, mentioned in at least nineteen HEAL Blog entries, underscoring the immensity of the threat that’s facing rural and suburban America. While emergent care and law enforcement agencies are attempting various approaches to making headway in dealing with these issues, many state legislative and executive branches are instead taking a hard line on the issue, relying on outdated and troublesome research, as well as outmoded prejudices and preconceived notions about who is to blame, who is at fault, and how hard to come down upon them.

It doesn’t help that, despite solid research and scientific evidence, current public opinion about how to deal with the crisis has seen a troubling resurgence of blunt force solutions, over nuanced, evidence-based approaches. The prevailing sentiment seen in many of the rural and suburban areas is, “It’s their problem, and if they can’t deal with it, it’s still their problem.” While this line of thinking may provide feelings of moral superiority and indignity, they do not help craft real world solutions, especially when those sentiments become campaign talking points.

2017 pushing 2016 down

Photo Source: Fotolia by Adobe

Overall, 2016 has been something of a rough year, with less than glowing reports coming from virtually every sector of the HCV advocacy arena. And, if we’re being honest, we face uncertain times in 2017, with many of us watching and waiting for signs that we’re moving in either direction. This is the most frustrating part for virtually all parties involved: we just don’t know what’s next, nor do we know how or for what to prepare. And with that, we bid 2016 adieu.
__________

Disclaimer: HEAL Blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the Community Access National Network (CANN), but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about Hepatitis-related issues and updates. Please note that the content of some of the HEAL Blogs might be graphic due to the nature of the issues being addressed in it.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The 2016 Election, and What This May Mean for Healthcare

HEAL Blog is the recipient of the ADAP Advocacy Association’s 2015-2016 ADAP Social Media Campaign of the Year Award
By: Marcus J. Hopkins, Blogger

The passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, included a provision that gave states the option to expand Medicaid coverage in order to cover citizens whose incomes were above the Federal Poverty Level (FPL), but whose incomes still present a significant barrier to purchasing health insurance. Of the 50 United States and the District of Columbia, 32 states (including DC) have opted to expand their Medicaid programs. Nineteen states have opted not to expand access.

Expanding access to Medicaid is an essential piece of the ACA, as it was designed to help increase the number of people with access to affordable healthcare. Because the ACA envisioned low-income people receiving coverage through Medicaid, it does not provide financial assistance to people below poverty for other coverage options. As a result, in states that do not expand Medicaid, many adults fall into a ”coverage gap” of having incomes above Medicaid eligibility limits, but below the lower limit for Marketplace premium tax credits (Garfield & Damico, 2016). Since the expansion of Medicaid under the ACA, 73,137,154 Americans were enrolled in Medicaid/CHIP as of August 2016 (Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 2016).

There are an estimated 2.6 million Americans who currently fall into that coverage gap, and of the states that did not expand Medicaid, four states represent 64% of those people (TX – 26%, FL – 18%, GA – 12%, NC – 8%). When looking at the geographic distribution of those 2.6 million Americans, 91% are in the American South (Garfield & Damico, 2016). Demographically, 46% are White non-Hispanics, 18% are Hispanic, and 31% are Black, and over half are middle-aged (age 35-54) or near elderly (55 to 64). Additionally, the majority of people in the coverage gap are in poor working families.

Donald J. Trump

Photo Source: NBC News

President-elect, Donald J. Trump, as well as the incoming Republican-led Congress and Senate, have openly stated that their first priority, at the beginning of the next legislative session, is the repeal of the ACA. There are very few comprehensive plans being proffered to replace the ACA, and healthcare professionals, providers, payers, patients, and advocates, alike, are currently unsure about the future of the expansion, and whether or not that aspect of the ACA will be retained in the forthcoming repeal.

It bodes poorly for those existing people infected with viral hepatitis, especially Hepatitis C (HCV), who stand to lose coverage if the Medicaid expansion does not survive the repeal, even with the existence of drug manufacturer and private Patient Assistance Programs (PAPs). In order for those PAPs to be accessed, however, people must first know about them; without the aid of social workers, healthcare aides, and advocates, people living with HCV are unlikely to find out about these PAPs, unless this information is provided to them by a doctor or nurse.

An additional concern exists for those recipients of the Ryan White Program. Over the past eight years, HIV/AIDS advocates and policy wonks have been in a near-constant debate about whether to reopen the Ryan White Care Act for reauthorization to address some of the ways in which the current law has not necessarily aged well, in terms of keeping up with newer treatments, costs, and funding paradigms. The concern over the past five years has been that the Republican-controlled Congress would “gut” the bill, cutting out many of the provisions upon which organizations and patients have come to rely. With repealing the ACA having played such a large role in this year’s election, concerns about reopening the act are likely to deepen, rather than abate. It is important to note that many states include HCV therapies under their AIDS Drug Assistance Program’s drug formularies.

The HEAL Blog  will pay close attention to both programs, as well as other HIV and HCV-related issues throughout 2017.

References:

__________

Disclaimer: HEAL Blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the Community Access National Network (CANN), but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about Hepatitis-related issues and updates. Please note that the content of some of the HEAL Blogs might be graphic due to the nature of the issues being addressed in it.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized